
Arthroplasty
Improvements in pain and function greater in anterior approach THA than posterior approach
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):419-34.17 studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials, were selected for this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of anterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty to posterior approach. This review was conducted in order to evaluate and compare surgical and clinical results between these two approaches. The results of this study indicate that the anterior approach offered greater progress in pain, function, ability to walk, and narcotic ingestion, as compared to the posterior approach. No significant differences were noted in other variables, including estimated blood loss, rate of intraoperative fractures or recovery of gait.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.