
SHOULDER & ELBOW
Arthroscopic vs. open Bankart repair for anterior shoulder dislocation
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Apr;135(4):529-3816 trials with 3 randomized controlled trials, 1 quasi-randomized controlled trial, and 12 controlled clinical trials evaluating a total of 827 shoulder treatments were included in this meta-analysis to analyze the effectiveness and safety of arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations. Pooled results demonstrated that arthroscopic repair resulted in greater recovery of range of motion, but had higher recurrence and re-operation rates than open repair. Rates of adverse events, such as dysesthesia, persistent pain, and wound problems, were similar between arthroscopic and open Bankart repair.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in


Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now