TRAUMA
Treatment of 3 or 4-part proximal humerus fracture: surgical vs. non-surgical treatment
J Invest Surg. 2015 Aug;28(4):215-24.5 randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment of displaced 3 or 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine how patient outcome differed depending on whether a surgical or non-surgical method was used for the treatment of a fracture. Functional outcome was the primary outcome of interest, while quality of life and complication rates were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results indicated no significant difference between groups in terms of functional outcome. Pooled analysis of EuroQoL-5D scores from two studies demonstrated significantly greater scores following surgical versus non-surgical management.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
