
Sports Medicine
Addition of extra-articular to intra-articular ACL reconstruction shows minimal benefit
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2609-188 randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the use of intra-articular reconstruction alone with the combined use of both extra-articular and intra-articular reconstruction for the treatment of a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The purpose of the study was to determine if the addition of extra-articular reconstruction to the standard interior reconstruction affects knee function and stability. Secondary outcome measures were the comparative risks of complication between the two treatment options. Pooling of results indicated improved knee stability (significant improvement in pivot-shift and Lachman test scores) for patients receiving both types of reconstruction, however, no significant differences in tests of overall functional outcome were noted. The difference in complication risk between groups was insignificant.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.