ARTHROPLASTY
No significant difference when using hydroxyapatite-coated or non-coated femoral stems
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4):504-8. Epub 2007 Mar 969 patients (84 hips) were randomized to receive one of two treatments as part of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The first group received hydroxyapatite/tricalcium-phosphate coated stems and the second group received non-coated stems. The outcomes being examined were clinical and radiographic results. Results indicated that there were no significant differences in the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the two groups.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
