TRAUMA
OTA 2015: Surgery vs nonsurgical treatment of proximal humeral fracture over 2-yr followup
250 patients with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck were randomly assigned to receive either surgical or non-surgical intervention as treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare functional and clinical outcomes, as well as cost-effectiveness, between the two methods to determine if surgery offers any significant advantage over conservative treatment. The results demonstrated no significant difference in Oxford Shoulder scores (OSS) between groups, while surgery demonstrated lower cost-effectiveness than non-surgical treatment over the entire 2 year period.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
