
Arthroplasty
Minimally invasive direct anterior vs. direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty
J Orthop Res. 2015 Sep;33(9):1305-10One hundred and sixty four patients with end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip were randomized to undergo total hip arthroplasty with either a direct lateral approach or a minimally invasive direct anterior approach. The purpose of this study was to compare these two methods in terms of invasiveness, including biomarkers associated with muscle damage and inflammation, and clinical outcomes over the first four postoperative days. Results demonstrated significantly higher serum creatine kinase levels immediately after surgery and at 4 days postoperatively in the direct anterior approach group compared to the direct lateral approach group. In contrast, pain levels over the first four days postoperatively were significantly lower following the direct anterior approach versus the direct lateral approach.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.