
Arthroplasty
Cemented vs. cementless stem components in arthroplasty for fractures of the femoral neck
Bone Joint J. 2015 Nov;97-B(11):1475-80.141 patients who suffered a displaced fracture of the femoral neck were randomized to receive either cemented or cementless stems for fixation during total or hemiarthroplasty of the hip. The purpose was to compare clinical assessments and radiological outcomes to determine if either fixation method provided advantageous outcomes one year postoperatively. The results indicated that the Harris Hip Score, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire and quality of life (EQ-5D) questionnaires were significantly better in the cemented group. Acetabular erosion occurred more often for the hemiarthroplasties in the cementless group while heterotopic ossification occurred more often in the cemented group. Additionally, 8 intraoperative fractures occurred in the cementless group while none occurred in the cemented group.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.