GENERAL ORTHOPAEDICS
Computer-based patient-reported outcomes improve satisfaction and compliance
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Orthopedics. 2016 Jan 1;39(1):e31-5
308 patients from spine, upper extremity, and trauma orthopaedic clinics were recruited to compare electronic-based and paper-based administration of validated orthopaedic patient-reported outcome measures (PSS, FFI, ODI, SF-36) in terms of compliance and patient satisfaction. All outcome measures (except SF-36) displayed comparable results between administration methods, and patients were significantly more satisfied with the electronic-based administration and significantly more likely to complete the forms and answer more questions, than with the paper-based assessments.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
