Ace Report Cover
ISASS 2016: 1-yr results silicon nitride device vs. PEEK cages with autograft in ACDF
Reprints
Cite This
Reprints
Cite This
AceReport Image
Spine
ISASS 2016: 1-yr results silicon nitride device vs. PEEK cages with autograft in ACDF
Contributing Authors

M Arts J Wolfs T Corbin

96 patients with radicular symptoms due to single-level disc herniation and/or osteophytes of the cervical spine and scheduled for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) were randomized to undergo the procedure with either a polyetheretherketone cage filled with autograft, or a silicon nitride spacer containing porous silicon nitride without graft material. The study was conducted in order to determine if the silicon nitride spacer with porous silicon nitride in the graft space was an effective, noninferior alternative to standard PEEK cages with autograft. Neck Disability Index, Short Form-36, visual analog scale pain, operative outcomes, fusion rates, mean rotation on flexion/extension, device subsidence, and development of adjacent level symptoms was comparable between groups.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. ISASS 2016: 1-yr results silicon nitride device vs. PEEK cages with autograft in ACDF. ACE Report. 2016;6(4):37. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report