
Hand & Wrist
No benefits to splint/cast immobilization with reduction for boxer’s fractures
Orthopedics. 2016 May 1;39(3):188-925 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a total of 215 patients, were included in this systematic review to determine if there are benefits to reduction and splint or cast immobilization to fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck (or more commonly known as boxer's fractures). Analysis of the included studies indicated that splint or cast immobilization yields no benefits in range of motion, strength, or any other measured outcomes when compared to soft wrap or buddy taping treatment without reduction. On the contrary, majority of trials favoured soft wrap intervention for range of motion and strength improvements compared to splint or cast immobilization.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.