
Sports Medicine
Efficacy of osteochondral autograft transfer versus microfracture for cartilage lesions
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):2118-2130
Six comparative studies (5RCT, 1 cohort) were included in this meta-analysis comparing osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) and microfracture (MFx) in the treatment of cartilage lesions of the knee. Activity level, patient-reported outcome scores, and the incidence of failure were pooled. Results demonstrated a significant difference in Tegner score in favour of OAT groups compared to MFx groups, though subgroup analysis suggested the difference may be associated with greater lesion size. The patient reported outcome scores also favoured the OAT groups compared to MFx within a 3-year follow-up, though no significant difference was observed when pooled at 5-10 years. The incidence of failure was significantly lower among OAT groups compared to MFx groups.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.