ARTHROPLASTY
AAOS2017: Similar mid-term outcome between mini-incision posterior Vs. two-incision THA
72 patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty were included in this randomized controlled trial to compare mid-term outcomes of two different surgical approaches. Patients were randomized to either a mini-incision posterior approach or a two-incision approach. At a mean follow-up of 8 years, a total of three revisions in the mini-incision group and two revision in the two-incision group had been required. There were no significant differences in Harris Hip Score, SF-12 physical & mental components, or patients perception of the operated hip as percentage of normal.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
