ARTHROPLASTY
Midterm outcomes for cementless porous tantalum monoblock vs cemented modular tibial components
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):666-674Six studies were included in this meta-analysis comparing mid-term outcomes of cementless porous tantalum monoblock tibial components and cemented modular tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Radiological results demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of radiolucency among cementless porous tantalum monoblock tibial components compared to cemented modular tibial components, but no significant differences were observed in the incidence of component loosening. Despite statistically significant differences noted in functional outcomes, the observed sizes of differences were modest and not likely to be clinically relevant.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
