TRAUMA
Intra- vs. extramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures
Int Orthop. 2017 Feb;41(2):403-41311 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis comparing outcomes between intramedullary fixation and extramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Outcomes which demonstrated significant differences between fixation options included blood loss and postoperative mobility scores, both favour intramedullary implants. Otherwise, operative time, length of stay, transfusion rate, and incidence of complications did not significantly differ between intramedullary and extramedullary fixation devices.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
