TRAUMA
Disability & implant irritation with intramedullary nail vs. plate for midshaft clavicle fractures
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):532-539120 patients with a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture were randomized to fixation with either an intramedullary nail or a plate. Patients were assessed for disability, incidence of implant-related irritation, and incidence of removal due to implant-related irritation. Results on the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score demonstrated no significant difference between groups at 39 months. The overall incidence of implant-related irritation did not significantly differ between groups. The incidence of implant removal due to irritation was 35/62 in the nail group and 21/56 in the plate group.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
