
Arthroplasty
COA2017: No noticeable benefit of patient-specific instruments over conventional instruments in TKA
50 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to have the procedure completed with the use of either patient-specific instruments (PSI) or conventional instruments. Patients allocated to the PSI group underwent preoperative MRI for manufacturing of the instruments. Patients were assessed for intraoperative parameters related to resource utilization, while follow-up at 6 months was used to assessed component migration on radiosterometric analysis and patient-reported outcome measures. Total cost per procedure was also calculated. No significant differences between groups in RSA or PROM results were obtained at 6 months. Overall, cost per procedure increased by over $1700.00 when using PSI versus conventional instruments.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.