TRAUMA
OTA2017: Locking plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibial fracture
320 patients with a distal tibial fracture were randomized to fixation with either an intramedullary nail or a locking plate. Patients were assessed for disability and function after 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Complications were recorded, and economic analysis was performed. Clinical measures were reported to significantly favour intramedullary nail fixation after 3 months, though differences at 6 and 12 months were reported to not significantly differ between the two fixation types. The Economic evaluation also favoured intramedullary nail fixation.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
