
Arthroplasty
AAOS 2016: Solid-backed vs. Cluster-hole acetabular cups show comparable outcomes for THA
100 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomized to undergo the procedure with a solid-backed or cluster-hole acetabular component (fixed without screws). The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence rate of osteolysis, volume of osteolytic lesion, and functional outcomes scores between acetabular components over a 5-year follow-up period. Results demonstrated that solid-backed and cluster-hole components were comparable for all outcomes. The hypothesized risks/complications of cluster-hole acetabular components were not observed, indicating that there may no longer be a significant drawback to the use of cluster-hole components (with optional screw fixation).
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.