
Trauma
Assessment of complications and mobility between SHS and IMN for trochanteric fractures
Injury. 2017 Dec;48(12):2762-27671000 patients with an AO type A1-3 trochanteric fracture were randomized to fixation with either an intramedullary nail or a sliding hip screw. Patients were assessed for postoperative pain, mobility, and the incidence of complications over 1-year follow-up, as well as surgical outcomes during the perioperative stay. Subgroup analyses were performed for outcomes based on fracture type. No significant differences between IMN and SHS devices were found in either primary analyses or subgroup analyses when compared for the rates of implant cutout, device failure, nonunion, superficial infection, and deep infection. The only significant difference observed for clinical measures was lower pain among patients with an AO type 3 fracture treated with an IMN versus a SHS. No significant difference in mobility scores were noted between IMN and SHS groups.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.