
Trauma
Clinical advantages at 6-24 mos after tibial IMN with supra- vs. infrapatellar insertion
Int Orthop. 2016 Dec;40(12):2611-2617162 patients scheduled for intramedullary nail fixation following a tibial shaft fracture were randomized to nail insertion via a suprapatellar approach (SPA) or an infrapatellar approach (IFA). Clinical scores and radiological assessment of union, patellofemoral cartilage changes and any incident of articular injury were assessed over a 24-month follow-up. From 6 to 24 months, the SPA group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores compared to the IFA group. Also from 6 to 24 months, functional outcome via either the Lysholm score or the SF-36 Physical component score was significantly higher in the SPA group compared to the IFA group.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.