
87 patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty were randomized to receive lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) or subscapularis tenotomy (ST) to compare differences in healing rates and fatty infiltration. At 12 months, there was no difference between the two groups with respect to the healing rate and the Goutallier mean fatty infiltration grade. From the pre-operative assessment to the post-operative evaluation, there was a one-grade increase in fatty infiltration in the ST group, whereas there was a 0.5 grade increase in the LTO group. Assessment following the 12 month follow-up failed to identify a superior technique for subscapularis mobilization.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.