
Sports Medicine
Comparing outcomes of standard & modified transtibial vs anteromedial portal tunnel drilling in ACLR
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Sep;16(3):1790-1799. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.639512 studies (prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials) were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis which sought to compare outcomes between the standard transtibial technique (sTT) and independent tunnel drilling technique (ID) in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, as well as the modified transtibial technique (mTT) and independent tunnel drilling. Results demonstrated significant differences in favour of ID groups over sTT groups for outcome in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and side-to-side difference in instrumented anterior tibial translation. Differences between ID groups and mTT groups were not significant for any outcome measure.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.