Home
ACE Reports
All Specialties All Specialties All Specialties Arthroplasty Arthroplasty Arthroplasty Evidence Based Medicine Evidence Based Medicine Evidence Based Medicine Foot & Ankle Foot & Ankle Foot & Ankle General Orthopaedics General Orthopaedics General Orthopaedics Hand & Wrist Hand & Wrist Hand & Wrist Metabolic Disorders Metabolic Disorders Metabolic Disorders Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis Pediatric Orthopaedics Pediatric Orthopaedics Pediatric Orthopaedics Peri-Operative Peri-Operative Peri-Operative Physical Therapy & Rehab Physical Therapy & Rehab Physio & Rehab Shoulder & Elbow Shoulder & Elbow Shoulder & Elbow Spine Spine Spine Sports Medicine Sports Medicine Sports Medicine Trauma Trauma Trauma Tumour Tumour Tumour Author Interviews Author Interviews Author Interview Conference Report Conference Report Conference Reports
Original Content
News
Multimedia
About
Search
Home
ACE Reports
Arthroplasty Evidence Based Medicine Foot & Ankle General Orthopaedics Hand & Wrist Metabolic Disorders Osteoarthritis Pediatric Orthopaedics Peri-Operative Physical Therapy & Rehab Shoulder & Elbow Spine Sports Medicine Trauma Tumour Author Interviews Conference Report
Original Content
News
Multimedia
About
Search
Previous Ace Report Addition of epinephrine to popliteal nerve block does not extend analgesia in ankle fusion Next Ace Report Addition of epinephrine to popliteal nerve block does not extend analgesia in ankle fusion
Ace Report Cover
Trauma
Comparison between ORIF & combined internal/external fixation for tibial plafond fracture
Reprints
Cite This
Reprints
Cite This
AceReport Image
Trauma
Comparison between ORIF & combined internal/external fixation for tibial plafond fracture
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;54(4):646-51.
Contributing Authors

D Wang JP Xiang XH Chen QT Zhu

9 studies investigating open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and limited internal fixation combined with and external fixator (LIFEF) for the treatment of tibial plafond fractures were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether LIFEF yielded fewer postoperative complications than ORIF. The meta-analysis found that rates of nonunion, malunion, and delayed union, bone healing, deep and superficial infection, arthritis symptoms, and chronic osteomyelitis were comparable between groups.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with

OR
Forgot Password?
OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Comparison between ORIF & combined internal/external fixation for tibial plafond fracture. ACE Report. 2015;5(10):16. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/comparison-between-orif-combined-internal-external-fixation-for-tibial-plafond-fracture

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report