
General Orthopaedics
Computer-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided stem cell injection for osteonecrosis of the hip
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Int Orthop. 2018 Jul;42(7):1593-1598. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3953-4
30 patients with bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head scheduled for core decompression with stem cell injection had one hip allocated to computer-assisted navigation and one hip allocated to traditional fluoroscopic guidance. Outcome measures included precision of trocar placement, including relative to the subchondral bone of the femoral head and to the center of the osteonecrotic zone, radiation time, and rate of collapse and total hip arthroplasty over a 6-year follow-up. Results demonstrated a significantly better precision of trocar placement in the CAS group compared to the fluoroscopy group, as well as a significantly shorter radiation time. Additionally, the rate of head collapse and the need for total hip arthroplasty over the follow-up was significantly lower in the CAS group compared to the fluoroscopy group
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.