
Osteoarthritis
Cost-effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation vs. IAS injection for treatment of knee OA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20: 302.151 patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain were randomized to receive cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) or intra-articular corticosteroid (IAS) injections. Patients in the IAS group were given the opportunity to cross over to CRFA treatment after 6 months, however these patients were not included in the CRFA group analysis. The primary outcome of interest was the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Additional outcomes of interest included QALYs, treatment cost, incremental QALY gain, incremental cost, and total cost. Follow up was performed at 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The findings revealed that while CRFA treatment costed more than IAS injection, it provided more improvements in QALY at a cost under the 100,000USD threshold set for cost-effectiveness in the Medicare system.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.