
Sports Medicine
Dry needling with and without PRP injection for patellar tendinopathy
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):610-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546513518416.
23 patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy were randomized to treatment with eccentric exercise and either ultrasound-guided leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection with dry needling (DN) or dry needling without PRP injection. The purpose of this trial was to compare patient-reported outcomes between to the interventions. Results at 12 weeks revealed statistically and clinically significant improvements in Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment (VISA), Lysholm, and VAS scores versus baseline with PRP whereas only Lysholm scores improved with DN. At 26 weeks, VISA, Tegner, Lysholm and VAS scores improved significantly versus baseline with DN whereas this occurred with only VISA and VAS scores in PRP patients. Nevertheless, overall outcome was not significantly different between groups.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.