
Arthroplasty
EFORT: Internal fixation vs. arthroplasty for treatment of hip fractures in elderly men
50 elderly male patients with displaced intracapsular fractures were randomly assigned to treatment with either internal fixation or arthroplasty. The purpose was to determine the comparative efficacy between these two surgical options for treatment in this patient population. Operative data demonstrated a significantly reduced operative time for internal fixation. Results after one year revealed a higher rate of re-operation and fracture healing complications with internal fixation compared to arthroplasty. No significant differences after one year were noted between groups for pain, mobility or mortality.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.