
Spine
Glycerol-preserved bone allografts equally effective as freeze-dried allografts for ACDF
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jan;22(1):1-10.
106 patients with radiculopathy or myelopathy due to neural compression scheduled for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion were randomized to receive either glycerol-preserved or freeze-dried bone allografts. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of glycerol-preserved and freeze-dried allografts, in terms of graft subsidence, functional outcomes, and pain. The results of this study indicated that glycerol-preserved bone allografts had similar rates of subsidence, adverse outcomes and pain when compared to the freeze-dried group.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.