
Foot & Ankle
Intramedullary fibular nail versus plate fixation for ankle fractures
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Jun;100(4Suppl):S255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 471 patients with an ankle fracture were randomized to undergo internal fixation using either an intramedullary nail or a plate. Patients were evaluated for radiographic union at 1 year postoperatively, and were also assessed for functional outcome using the Kitaoka score and Olerud-Molander score. Results demonstrated similar union rates between intramedullary nails (100%) and plates (94%). Functional outcomes were significantly better with the intramedullary nail, and fewer complications were also recorded in the group. Seven patients initially allocated to the intramedullary nail had to be converted to plate fixation due to technical reasons.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.