
Shoulder & Elbow
ISAKOS2017: Comparison of in situ repair vs tear completion-repair for partial-thickness RC tears
100 patients scheduled for arthroscopic repair of a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear were randomized to either an in situ repair or completion of the tear followed by repair. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months postoperatively for clinical scores of pain and function, and MRI to assess tendon integrity and retear rate. Results demonstrated no significant differences between groups in either the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Score, the Constant score, the Simple Shoulder Test, and a visual analog scale for pain over the first year after surgery. Retear rate did not significantly differ between groups in articular-sided tears, but retear rate was significantly lower in the in situ group among bursal-sided tears.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.