Lower risk of malunion, higher risk of wound complication with MIPO vs IMN for distal tibia fracture
Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec; 11(6): 954–965.Ten RCTs with a total of 911 patients were included in this meta-analysis comparing intramedullary nailing and minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Outcomes of interest included operative time, radiation time, union time, the incidence of malunion, the incidence of non-union or delayed union, and the incidence of wound complications. Results revealed a significantly lower risk of malunion, but higher risk of wound complications, with minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis compared to intramedullary nailing. Pooled results for remaining outcomes were not significantly different.
Unlock the full ACE Report
You have access to {0} free articles per month.Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock NowCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.
{0} of {1} free articles
Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.
Upgrade Now
