
Arthroplasty
No difference between minimally invasive and open anterolateral methods in cementless THA
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jan;25(1):111-6.
90 patients with unilateral primary hip osteoarthritis scheduled to undergo cementless total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive the procedure through a minimally invasive or conventional open anterolateral Watson-Jones technique. The purpose of this study was to compare both techniques in terms of blood loss, pain, and function over four years. The results of this trial suggest that the minimally invasive approach can provide an early reduction in postoperative pain relief; however, it appears that there are no significant mid-term clinical and functional benefits for patients undergoing a MIS producer.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.