
Shoulder & Elbow
Open vs arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Apr;135(4):529-38.16 studies (3 RCTs, 1 quasi-RCT, and 12 controlled clinical trials) were included in this meta-analysis which compared the efficacy and safety of open versus arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations. Range of motion, incidence of recurrence, reoperation, and complications were among the outcomes assessed. Although results indicated similar rates of complications between groups, patients who underwent arthroscopic repair experienced significantly greater rates of recurrence and reoperation. However, arthroscopic repair also led to significantly superior recovery of range of motion. These results should be interpreted with caution as lower quality evidence was included in this meta-analysis. Additional randomized controlled trials should be conducted in order to increase the amount of high-quality evidence on this topic.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.