
Spine
Prestige cervical disc replacement: improved clinical outcomes and segmental motion
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):308-18
541 patients, between the ages of 22 and 73, with symptomatic degenerative cervical disc disease were placed in 1 of 2 groups to test the safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) compared to anterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion. Results demonstrated that patients in each group experienced improved NDI, SF-36 PCS, and neck and arm pain scores 5 years after treatment. All of these measurements were similar between the groups at final follow up, except for NDI, which was found to be significantly better in patients who received the CDA. Findings also differed between groups when looking at neurological success and secondary surgeries, showing that those who received CDA were more likely to have neurological success and less likely to go through secondary surgery (due to adverse events) following treatment.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.