Ace Report Cover
Similar Outcomes With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Dressing For Open Tibial Fractures
Download
Reprints
Cite This
+ Favorites
Download
Reprints
Cite This
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
TRAUMA
Similar Outcomes With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Dressing For Open Tibial Fractures
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jul;102-B(7):912-917

Four hundred and eighty-six patients with an tibial shaft open fracture scheduled for a open reduction and fixation procedure were randomized into receiving negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or standard dressing for wound management. The primary outcome of interest was the Disability Rating Index (DRI) at 12 months post-operation. The secondary outcomes of interest included the following: quality of life using via the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12), incidence of wound infection at 6 weeks, and the incidence of non-union at 12 months post-operation. Furthermore, DRI was measured at 3, 6, and 9 months post-operation. Finally, the quality of wound healing was also evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 months post-operation. The results demonstrated no significant differences in DRI scores between the 2 treatment groups. All secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the NPWT and standard groups. However, patients in the NPWT group reported significantly higher satisfaction with the quality of the wound healing compared to the standard dressing.

Unlock the full ACE Report

You have access to {0} free articles per month.
Click below to unlock and view this {1}
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence content for just $1.99 per week.
{0} of {1} free articles

Become an OrthoEvidence Premium Member. Expand your perspective with high-quality evidence.

Upgrade Now
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade Account
Upgrade
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Similar Outcomes With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Dressing For Open Tibial Fractures. ACE Report. 2020;10(8):20. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/similar-outcomes-with-negative-pressure-wound-therapy-vs-standard-dressing-for-open-tibial-fractures

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report