Ace Report Cover
Statistical, but not clinically relevant, differences of TDR vs multidisciplinary rehab for cLBP
Reprints
Cite This
Reprints
Cite This
AceReport Image
Spine
Statistical, but not clinically relevant, differences of TDR vs multidisciplinary rehab for cLBP
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1480-1488

173 patients with chronic low back pain due to single-level lumbar degenerative disease were randomized to either total disc replacement or a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Patients were followed up for 8 years after treatment for outcome on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), as well as pain, quality of life, occupational status, satisfaction, drug use, complications and additional back surgery. After 8 years, the mean improvement in ODI score from baseline significantly favoured TDR over MDR in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, though the size of the difference between groups was suggested to be below a clinically important difference threshold of 10 points.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. Statistical, but not clinically relevant, differences of TDR vs multidisciplinary rehab for cLBP. ACE Report. 2017;7(11):33. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/statistical-but-not-clinically-relevant-differences-of-tdr-vs-multidisciplinary-rehab-for-clbp

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report