
Osteoarthritis
Thermal vs. non-thermal rehabilitation for knee OA
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Dec;57(9-10):561-9.Two hundred and thirty three patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) were randomized to either thermal or non-thermal rehabilitation, so that the clinical effects of the two treatments could be compared. The primary outcome of interest was VAS pain score at 12 months. On day 21, the final treatment day, there was no significant difference between groups in VAS scores for pain or Lequesne index for function. At 6 months, however, the non-thermal rehabilitation group demonstrated significantly lower VAS pain score, WOMAC pain score, and Lequense index score compared to the thermal group. By 12 month follow-up, the thermal group demonstrated favourable pain outcome through both VAS pain and WOMAC pain compared to the non-thermal group. Functional outcome on the Lequesne Index was not significantly different between groups at 12 months.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.