
Physical Therapy & Rehab
Cervico-thoracic vs. cervical thrust manipulation for mechanical neck pain
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Clin Rehabil. 2013 Jun;27(6):504-12. doi: 10.1177/0269215512464501. Epub 2012 Nov 5
82 patients with chronic mechanical neck pain were randomized to receive full manipulation, which included mid-cervical, cervico-thoracic and thoracic thrust manipulations, or to a group receiving cervical thrust manipulation alone. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was an added benefit of the full manipulation treatment to neck pain, disability and range of motion. After one week, both treatments demonstrated a similar improvement in pain and range of motion, although patient-perceived disability was more greatly reduced in patients who received the thrust manipulation to both the cervical and thoracic spine.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.