
Hand & Wrist
Disability score and range of motion favoured with palmar plating versus casting for displaced DRF
Acta Orthop. 2019 Apr;90(2):123-128. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.156161480 patients with a displaced distal radius fracture were randomized to primary treatment through either palmar plate fixation or cast immobilization. Patients were assessed over 2-year follow-up, which included patient-reported disability (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH]), wrist range of motion, grip strength, adverse events, and cases of secondary surgery. A total of 18/42 patients assigned to cast immobilization demonstrated loss of fracture reduction; 16 of these patients underwent secondary palmar plating. At 2 years, DASH score was significantly lower in the palmar plate group compared to the cast immobilization group. In subgroup analysis, the significant difference between groups when considering patients <65 years of age, but not in patients 65 years of age or older. Significant differences between groups at 2 years were also observed in range of flexion and range of ulnar deviation.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.