
Arthroplasty
New oral anticoagulants do not differ significantly in safety and efficacy from enoxaparin
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
BMJ. 2012 Jun 14;344:e3675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3675
A meta-analysis of 16 randomized trials (38747 patients) was conducted to investigate the effects of new oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban), compared with standard enoxaparin, for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement surgery. After investigating relative risks of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, clinically relevant bleeding, and deaths, the anticoagulants did not differ in net clinical endpoint (a balance of efficacy and safety). Generally the results demonstrated that the higher the efficacy of a treatment, the higher the risk of bleeding tendency.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.