Ace Report Cover
No advantage of patient-specific instrumentation over conventional instruments in UKA
Reprints
Cite This
Reprints
Cite This
AceReport Image
Arthroplasty
No advantage of patient-specific instrumentation over conventional instruments in UKA
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1662-1670

55 patients scheduled for an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were randomized to either patient-specific instrumentation use or conventional instrumentation use for surgery. Patients were assessed for radiographic outcome at 6 weeks postoperatively, while clinical outcome on the Oxford Knee Score was assessed at 12 months postoperatively. Results demonstrated no significant differences between groups in the incidence of tibial or femoral outlying components in either coronal or sagittal alignment. OKS scores also did not significantly differ between groups at 12 months.

Unlock the full article

Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start Trial

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or continue reading this full article
Register Now
AskOE
Search
Close Search Window
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Create an Account

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see the email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Cite this Ace Report

OrthoEvidence. No advantage of patient-specific instrumentation over conventional instruments in UKA. ACE Report. 2019;9(2):81. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/no-advantage-of-patient-specific-instrumentation-over-conventional-instruments-in-uka

Copy Citation
Share this Ace Report