
Arthroplasty
Performance improved, but subjective function not altered by direct anterior vs transgluteal THA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2133-4148 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomized to either a direct anterior or transgluteal lateral approach. The primary outcome was the number of steps taken per day in the period leading up to 3- and 12-month follow-up. The highlighted secondary outcome measure was the Harris Hip Score, while other secondary outcome measures included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) function and bother scales, patient-reported activity level on a visual analog scale, and Timed 25-meter walk test. Results demonstrated a significantly greater number of daily steps taken at 3- and 12-month follow-up in the direct anterior approach group compared to the transgluteal approach group, while no significant difference in Harris Hip Scores was observed between groups.
Unlock the full article
Get unlimited access to OrthoEvidence with a free trial
Start TrialCritical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or continue reading this full article
Register Now

Subscribe to "The Pulse"
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics direct to your inbox.